Archetype

Ant reconstruction one homology at a time

  • home
  • About
  • Image Use
  • Archive
  • Eickwort’s Manual

The oldest known [cough… African… cough] ant

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010 | Ants, Metablogging, Publishing, Science, Web

Here’s a perfect example of what I like about blogs becoming an integral communication tool for the scientific community and interested folks alike:

Cretaceous African ant in amber (Courtesy of Vincent Perrichot via http://myrmecos.wordpress.com)

  1. A peer-review paper gets published;
  2. The media gets hold on the story;
  3. The blogs react: scientists and general public fill the comments section (in the genuine tone of the internets);
  4. The authors of the original paper join in the discussion.

Discussion may get heated, comments may get bitter, but the results are always rewarding for all.

Share/Save

Tags: Cretaceous

8 Comments to The oldest known [cough… African… cough] ant

1
Alex Wild
April 7, 2010

I would now like to run a control, where I disagree with a paper without the snark. Would the paper’s authors show up for discussion anyway? Or is being a jerk on the internet necessary to the process?

2
Roberto Keller
April 7, 2010

OMG, did you just call me a jerk!?

(You see Alex, there’s no way of not getting misinterpreted on the internet.)

Now, as you may know already, getting blog attention is already one of the parameters used to rank individual papers in some of the leading electronic journals in our field: scroll down to the Blog Coverage section. It is on the bests interest of authors to show up for discussion. I see this trend becoming more prevalent (wait, that’s the definition of a trend… oh well).

3
Ted C. MacRae
April 7, 2010

Man, it’s hard to look at that photo now and NOT see an ant!

4
James C. Trager
April 7, 2010

Yeah, Ted, NOW it is!

5
Vincent Perrichot
April 7, 2010

Now I have to play the bad guy (again?) and denounce your title: it’s not the oldest know ant, there are older sphecomyrmines from French and Burmese ambers. Well, ok, it may be the oldest ant of an extant subfamily… But pff, this is so much more fun to deal with extinct lineages 🙂
More seriously, I did like the development of the discussion here and on Myrmecos, both excellent blogs I have been visiting regularly before this episode. The policies and limited space in PNAS and relatives are very unfortunate, and it was really impossible to justify our placement in the main text; I guess it’s the prize for publishing in such journals but it could have been emphasized in the supplement material indeed. To keep in mind for future work…

6
Roberto Keller
April 8, 2010

You are more than welcome to play the bad guy on this blog anytime you want.

7
Ted C. MacRae
April 8, 2010

Sure, James – I didn’t mean to suggest that I alone knew it was an ant, only that now knowing its aspect it is suddenly quite clear 🙂

8
James C. Trager
April 8, 2010

My point, too. Just giving you a little good-natured ribbing.

Subscribe: Entries | Comments
And as we discussed last semester, the Army Ants will leave nothing but your bones.
- Tom Waits

Search

Recent Posts

  • This blog is now closed
  • Croatian Myrmecological Society
  • Merriam-Webster on cladistics
  • From the archive
  • A blog on social wasps and life

Archives

  • December 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Categories

Archetype is powered by WordPress.
WordPress Themes by webdemar.
Creative Commons License
Archetype by Roberto Keller is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.