Archive for April, 2009

Macromite’s Blog: scanning electron micrograph perfection

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009 | Metablogging, Science, Technique, Web | Comments Off on Macromite’s Blog: scanning electron micrograph perfection
A spruced-up version of a dirty box mite. 2009 © DEWalter.

A spruced-up version of a dirty box mite. 2009 © DEWalter.

A new blog just sprung into life. Macromite’s Blog:

› Continue reading


Tags: ,

Evolution today and tomorrow – Lisbon’s conference

Sunday, April 26th, 2009 | History of Science, Personalities, Theory, Web | Comments Off on Evolution today and tomorrow – Lisbon’s conference

I spend last Thursday and Friday attending a conference held at the University of Lisbon: Evolution today and tomorrow: Darwin evaluated by contemporary evolutionary and philosophical theories. 23 – 24 April 2009. Don’t let the event’s webpage design fool you, the conference was well organized and brought together a diverse array of interesting speakers, both Portuguese and from abroad. › Continue reading

Tags: ,

Cladistics wars 2.0

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009 | Cladistics, Education, Metablogging, Science | 2 Comments

There is a skirmish going on at Dechronization blog right now1. This is a coauthored blog about phylogenetics. I like used to like this blog (its was right there on my blogroll —->2). There are surprisingly very few blogs about phylogenetic methods these days, despite the wide use that phylogenies currently have  in evolutionary biology and beyond (e.g., linguistics). I will complain that, for nine authors, they post little, sometimes not a single post during a month.

› Continue reading

  1. 1. Update 12:00pm GMT, April 22nd, 2009. Original post on Dechronization deleted.

    1.2. Update, May 2nd, 2009. It seems that the original poster did not agree with the removal of his posts and reposted the Dechronization announcement of the Cladistics Workshop here.

  2. Update April 23nd, 2009. I took the link out of my blogroll to show a dear friend that I care more about him than a silly blog.

Homology Weekly: Mouthparts

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009 | Ants, Homology Weekly, Morphology | 9 Comments
Frontal part of the head in an <em>Anochetus emarginatus</em> worker, profile view (Scanning Electron Micrograph, Roberto Keller/AMNH)

Frontal part of the head in an Anochetus emarginatus worker, profile view (Scanning Electron Micrograph, Roberto Keller/AMNH)

This image shows the mouthparts of a trap-jaw ant in resting position. The only structures really visible are the prominent elongated mandibles (in yellow) that project forward. The rest of the pieces, laying immediately below, are retracted inside the preoral cavity.

› Continue reading

Tags: , , , , , ,

Honeybee or Honey Bee?

Thursday, April 16th, 2009 | Nomenclature, Taxonomy | Comments Off on Honeybee or Honey Bee?

In the preface of his 1956 classic Anatomy of the Honey Bee1 the great American entomologist Robert E. Snodgrass explains the book’s title:

First, it must be explained why the name of the bee appears in the title as two words, though “honeybee” is the customary form in the literature of apiculture. Regardless of dictionaries, we have in entomology a rule for insect common names that can be followed. It says: If the insect is what its name implies, write the two words separately; otherwise run them together. Thus we have such names as house fly, blow fly, and robber fly contrasted with dragonfly, caddicefly, and butterfly, because the latter are not flies, just as an aphislion is not a lion and a silverfish is not a fish. The honey bee is an insect and is pre-eminently a bee; “honeybee” is equivalent to “Johnsmith.” [vii]

› Continue reading

  1. Snodgrass, R. E. 1956. Anatomy of the Honey Bee. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, New York.


Photo Synthesis: new site for your feeds and blogrolls

Monday, April 13th, 2009 | Science, Web | 1 Comment

ScienceBlogs started a new blog with an interesting dynamic, the title of which is either a very clever use of terms or a super-geeky pun, depending on your level of causticity: Photo Synthesis.

› Continue reading


Homology Weekly: Metapleural Gland

<em>Tapinoma erraticum</em> worker. The rectangle shows the location of the left metapleural gland opening (Scanning Electron Micrograph, Roberto Keller/AMNH)

Tapinoma simrothi worker. The rectangle shows the opening location of the left metapleural gland (Scanning Electron Micrograph, Roberto Keller/AMNH)

The metapleural gland is the definitive character of ants. It is unique to the family. Nothing homologous or similar is found anywhere else in insects. Within the tree of life of Hymenoptera, myrmecologists agree that the appearance of this gland provides a good cutting point to marks-out ants as a monophyletic group1. You have it? You are an ant. You don’t? Sorry, you don’t qualify, get the hell out of here lousy wasp2. It is the ultimate ant synapomorphy.

› Continue reading

  1. Grimaldi, D. and D. Agosti (2000). The Oldest Ants are Cretaceous, Not Eocene: Comment. Canadian Entomologist 132(5):691-693.
  2. Yes, one can insult insects by calling them members of the Order Phthiraptera

Tags: , ,

Making up for last week’s April fool post

Thursday, April 9th, 2009 | Humor | Comments Off on Making up for last week’s April fool post

Last week I posted my Homology Weekly as an April’s fool joke attempt. Since I am sure I was the only one to found it somewhat funny (and looking back, barely so), I decided to make for it this week and post something really interesting for my readers and especially eye-candy for my myrmecologist colleagues. It will be ready to go tonight, provided I have some time to work after supper, but no later than tomorrow.

In my defense I have to say that nothing I wrote in that post about DNA sequences was false. It was meant as a parody/criticism of the level of reductionism that results from our practice of treating each single nucleotide position as a character for phylogenetic reconstruction equivalent to a complex morphological structure.

The evolution of the web

Friday, April 3rd, 2009 | Cladistics, Phylogeny | Comments Off on The evolution of the web

ResearchBlogging.orgSpider web, that is.

This is an excellent example of the way systematic papers should be. In the latest issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), Blackledge and coworkers assembled a comprehensive data set for cladistic analysis of orb web spiders that includes six different molecular loci, 143 morphological characters and behavior in the form of characters derived from web architecture.

› Continue reading

Tags: ,

Homology Weekly: DNA

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009 | Ants, Homology Weekly, Humor, Molecular | 1 Comment

dnaAt any given position along their DNA sequences, ants may have any of the following four nucleic acid types: A, T, C or G. Unless we are dealing with the mitochondrial genome that is known to have quite a few A+T-rich regions in insects, in which case expect to find just those two types of nucleotides.

› Continue reading

Tags: ,

Subscribe: Entries | Comments
And as we discussed last semester, the Army Ants will leave nothing but your bones.
- Tom Waits